Animal Science and Food Technology

Variability of milk urea nitrogen traits and their potential use in dairy cattle

Sergiy Ruban, Mykola Shabash, Olga Tupitska, Viktor Danshyn, Nataliia Slobodianiuk
Download article
Abstract

Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) is an important biomarker that reflects the efficiency of protein metabolism in cows, the level of consumption and quality of “input” protein, and the energy balance in the diet. MUN fluctuations are closely related to possible discrepancies in the total mixed ration (TMR), physiological and genetic factors. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of genetic (cow’s paternal origin) and paratype (calving year-month) factors on milk yield, quality and biochemical parameters of milk, in particular urea nitrogen concentration, in Holstein cows. The research was based on data from 595 cows kept at the Kolos Agricultural Firm LLC in the Kyiv region (Ukraine). The study was conducted under standard conditions with cows fed “without restrictions” and analysis of productivity indicators and biochemical indicators of milk quality. It was found that the factor “year-month of calving” has the greatest impact on productivity indicators and milk quality parameters, causing seasonal fluctuations associated with minor changes in feeding and microclimate. The influence of the sire (cow’s father) on milk yield per lactation was noted – 12.4%, milk fat content per lactation – 13.4%, milk protein content per lactation – 12.9%. The influence of non-genetic factors was quite high for daily milk yield, fat, protein and lactose content, as well as MUN. Even with total use of standard TMR, MUN values varied widely in cows from a minimum of 2.6 mg/dl to a maximum of 32.9 mg/dl, with average values of 12.31 ± 0.24 mg/dl, and depended on the cows’ ability to separate the diet, minor changes in the diet, and the level of protein and non-structural carbohydrates. A tendency was noted whereby at high MUN values (>16 mg/dl) the absolute level of such important milk components as fat, protein and lactose content decreases, which reduces the energy value of milk – ECM (energy-corrected milk). The results obtained indicated the need to include overall average samples of MUN across the entire herd to optimise feeding programmes and animal welfare management

Keywords

protein metabolism in cows; energy value of milk; Holstein breed; influence of factors

Suggested citation
Ruban, S., Shabash, M., Tupitska, O., Danshyn, V., & Slobodianiuk, N. (2025). Variability of milk urea nitrogen traits and their potential use in dairy cattle. Animal Science and Food Technology, 16(3), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal.3.2025.37
References
  1. Borshch, O.O. (2023). The impact of global climate change on individual elements of milk production technology. (Doctoral dissertation, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  2. Craig, A.-L., Gordon, A.W., Hamill, G., & Ferris, C.P. (2022). Milk composition and production efficiency within feed-to-yield systems on commercial dairy farms in Northern Ireland. Animals, 12(14), article number 1771. doi: 10.3390/ani12141771.
  3. De Vries, M. (2021). Impacts of nitrogen emissions on ecosystems and human health: A mini review. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 21, article number 100249. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100249.
  4. DSTU 3662:2018. (2019). Raw cow’s milk. Technical conditions. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=77350.
  5. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. (1986, March). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/168007a67b.
  6. Hall, M.B. (2023). Invited review: Corrected milk: Reconsideration of common equations and milk energy estimates. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(4), 2230-2246. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22219.
  7. Ishler, V.A. (2023). Interpretation of milk urea nitrogen (MUN) values. Retrieved from https://extension.psu.edu/interpretation-of-milk-urea-nitrogen-mun-values.
  8. Jahnel, R.E., Blunk, I., Wittenburg, D., & Reinsch, N. (2023). Relationship between milk urea content and important milk traits in Holstein cattle. Animal, 17(5), article number 100767. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100767.
  9. Jakobsen, J., Dürr, J.W., Jorjani, H., Forabosco, F., Loberg, A., & Philipsson, J. (2009). Genotype by environment international genetics evaluations of dairy bulls. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 18, 133-142.
  10. Kramarenko, A., Luhovyi, S., Kalynycnenko, H., & Kramarenko, S. (2025). Analysis of lactation length variability and its relationship to cow milk production. Scientific Horizons, 28(3), 9-23. doi: 10.48077/scihor3.2025.09.
  11. Langenfeld, N., Laurenpayne, & Bugbee, B. (2025). Colorimetric determination of urea V.4. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.14egnzmzqg5d/v4.
  12. Law of Ukraine No. 3447-IV “On the Protection of Animals from Cruelty”. (2006, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3447-15#Text.
  13. Li, K., Pang, S., Li, Z., Ding, X., Gan, Y., Gan, Q., & Fang, S. (2023). House ammonia exposure causes alterations in microbiota, transcriptome, and metabolome of rabbits. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, article number 1125195. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1125195.
  14. Li, M., Zhong, H., Li, M., Zheng, N., Wang, J., & Zhao, S. (2022). Contribution of ruminal bacteriome to the individual variation of nitrogen utilization efficiency of dairy cows. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, article number 815225. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.815225.
  15. Matvieiev, M., Getya, A., Nehrey, M., Yakubets, T., Ruban, S., Nazarko, O., Borshch, O.O., Lastovska, I., Baban, V., & Mashkin, Yu. (2025). Optimisation of dairy farming in Ukraine: Integrating modern information technologies for genetic improvement and sustainable herd management. Agronomy Research, 23(1), 435-447. doi: 10.15159/AR.25.010.
  16. Mortazavi, M., Zandi, M.B., Pahlavan, R., Nasab, M.E., & de Oliveira, H.R. (2025). Estimation of genetic parameters for milk urea nitrogen in Iranian Holstein cattle using random regression models. Agriculture, 15(4), article number 357. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15040357.
  17. Müller, C.B.M., Görs, S., Derno, M., Tuchscherer, A., Wimmers, K., Zeyner, A., & Kuhla, B. (2021). Differences between Holstein dairy cows in renal clearance rate of urea affect milk urea concentration and the relationship between milk urea and urinary nitrogen excretion. Science of the Total Environment, 755(2), article number 143198. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143198.
  18. Musembei, L., Bett, R., Gachuiri, C., & Kibegwa, F. (2023). Potential role of rumen bacteria in modulating milk production and composition of admixed dairy cows. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 76(2), article number ovad007. doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovad007.
  19. Nousiainen, J., Shingfield, K.J., & Huhtanen, P. (2004). Evaluation of milk urea nitrogen as a diagnostic of protein feeding. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(2), 386-398. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73178-1.
  20. Palma, O., Plà-Aragonés, L.M., Mac Cawley, A., & Albornoz, V.M. (2025). Mathematical methods applied to the problem of dairy cow replacements: A scoping review. Animals, 15(7), article number 970. doi: 10.3390/ani15070970.
  21. Plomaritou, A., Hanlon, M., Kantas, D., Georgakoudis, K., Dovolou, E., & Foskolos, A. (2025). A review of nitrogen use efficiency of dairy replacement heifers: Improving management practices and minimizing nitrogen losses. Animals, 15(7), article number 1031. doi: 10.3390/ani15071031.
  22. Procedure for Conducting Experiments on Animals by Scientific Institutions. (2012, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0416-12#Text.
  23. Risyahadi, S.T., Martin, R.S.H., Qomariyah, N., Suryahadi, S., Sukria, H.A., & Jayanegara, A. (2023). Effects of dietary extrusion on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, performance and milk composition of dairy cattle: A meta-analysis. Animal Bioscience, 36(10), 1546-1557. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0012.
  24. Ruban, S.Y., & Danshyn, V.O. (2024). Feed efficiency of dairy cattle as genetic trait. The Animal Biology, 26(1), 3-10. doi: 10.15407/animbiol26.01.003.
  25. Ruban, S.Y., & Vasilevsky, M.V. (2015). Organization of normalized feeding in dairy cattle breeding. Kyiv: Luxar.
  26. Sadvari, V.Y., Shevchenko, L.V., Slobodyanyuk, N.M., Tupitska, O.M., Gruntkovskyi, M.S., & Furman, S.V. (2024). Microbiome of craft hard cheeses from raw goat milk during ripening. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 15(3), 483-489. doi: 10.15421/022468.
  27. Savickienė, R., & Galnaitytė, A. (2024). Unveiling determinants of successful dairy farm performance from dairy exporting EU countries. Agriculture, 14(7), article number 1117. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14071117.
  28. Souza, V.C., Aguilar, M., Van Amburgh, M., Nayananjalie, W.A.D., & Hanigan, M.D. (2021). Milk urea nitrogen variation explained by differences in urea transport into the gastrointestinal tract in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(6), 6715-6726. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19787.
  29. Štolcová, M., Barton, L., & Řehák, D. (2024). Milk components as potential indicators of energy status in early lactation Holstein dairy cows from two farms. Animal, 18(8), article number 101235. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101235.
  30. VanRaden, P.M., Cole, J.B., Neupane, M., Toghiani, S., Gaddis, K.L., & Tempelman, R.J. (2021). Net merit as a measure of lifetime profit: 2021 revision. AIP research report NM$8 (05-21). Washington, D.C.: USDA.
  31. Wattiaux, M., Aguerre, M.J., & Powell, M. (2011). Background and overview on the contribution of dairy nutrition to addressing environmental concerns in Wisconsin: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and methane. In B.A. Cavallotti, A. Cesín Vargas, B. Ramírez Valverde & C.F. Marcof Álvarez (Eds.), Livestock farming in the face of the exhaustion of dominant paradigms (vol. 1, article number 111e39). Chapingo: Universidad Autoonoma Chapingo.
  32. Zeleke, A.W., Dimonaco, N.J., Lawther, K., Lavery, A., Ferris, C., Moorby, J., & Huws, S.A. (2025). Reducing crude protein content in the diet of lactating dairy cows improved nitrogen-use-efficiency and reduced N excretion in urine, whilst having no obvious effects on the rumen microbiome. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 16, article number 113. doi: 10.1186/s40104-025-01240-7.
  33. Zhao, X., Zheng, N., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2024). The role of milk urea nitrogen in nutritional assessment and its relationship with phenotype of dairy cows: A review. Animal Nutrition, 20, 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.08.007.