Animal Science and Food Technology

Preliminary assessment of the safety of genetically modified food products

Yuriy Balji
Download article
Abstract

Numerous studies on genetically modified food products indicate their safety and their potential to alleviate hunger worldwide. However, the issue of GM products and feeds remains relevant in the realm of food security. The purpose of this study is to present a comprehensive scheme of methods for determining the safety of GM food products and to develop a new method for assessing the safety of GM food products. This new method is based on the use of a biotest and the employment of Paramecium caudatum infusoria. In the study, GTS 40-3 and GTS 40-3-2 (Venus variety) soybeans, MON 00603 (NK 603) maize line, and non-GMO soybeans and maize were used as controls. Infusoria were prepared by culturing them in room temperature water (18- 23°C) without direct sunlight, with the addition of non-GMO yeast powder as a nutrient solution and senna extract. Subsequently, the initial material containing approximately 100 infusoria was transferred to 100 ml flasks and incubated for 2-3 days. At the initial stage of the experiment, from day 1 to day 15, daily records and visual assessments were conducted. The assessment included the quantity of infusoria, motility (chemotaxis), size, shape, and the percentage of dead infusoria. Venus soybeans (GTS 40-3-2) exhibited a toxic effect on the protozoa, which died in repeated trials on the 14th-15th day of feeding. It was observed that infusoria fed with soybeans containing the GTS 40-3-2 (Venus) transformation event changed their shape after 3 days from the start of the experiment. Over the course of 10 days from the beginning of the study, a decrease in movement, motility, and the quantity of infusoria was noted. On the 14th-15th day, mortality was observed. Negative changes were also observed in infusoria that were fed with MON 00603 (NK 603) maize. The application of this method in the practice of assessing the safety of GM food products can provide a preliminary evaluation of long-term effects over a relatively short period

Keywords

feeds; biotest; infusoria; toxicity; long-term effects

Suggested citation
Balji, Yu. (2023). Preliminary assessment of the safety of genetically modified food products. Animal Science and Food Technology, 14(3), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal.3.2023.9
References

1. Ahmad, N., Raza, G., Waheed, T., & Mukhtar, Z. (2021). Food safety issues and challenges of GM crops. In Policy issues in genetically modified crops. A global perspective (pp. 355-369). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820780-2.00016-9.

2. Al Mazrooei, S.S., & Alreshidi, D.R. (2023). PCR-screening of genetically modified organisms in food and feed products sold in Kuwait's market. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410823000846. 

3. All-Union Standard 13496:19-93. (1997). Fodder, mixed fodder, animal feed raw stuff. Methods for determination of nitrates and nitrites. Retrieved from http://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=92166.

4. All-Union Standard 31671:2012. (2012). Food Products. Determination of trace elements. Sample preparation method with the use of mineralization at elevated pressure. Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31470238.

5.  Babets, I., Vlasenko, L., Fleychuk, M., Nakonechna, N., & Salamin, O. (2024). The impact of Ukrainian imports on the food security of its trade partners. Ekonomika APK, 31(5), 10-19. doi: 10.32317/ekon.apk/5.2024.10. 6. Bandarra, B.S., Passos, H., Vidal, T., Martins, R.C., Quina, M.J., Pereira, J.L., & Römbke, J. (2023). Evaluation of a battery of biotests to improve waste ecotoxicity assessment (HP 14), using incineration bottom ash as a case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, article number 118513. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118513.

7. Blair, R., & Regenstein, J.M. (2020). GM food and human health. In Genetically modified and irradiated food controversial issues: Facts versus perceptions (pp. 69-98). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817240-7.00005-X.

8. BS EN 15763:2009. (2009). Foodstuffs. Determination of trace elements. Determination of arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead in foodstuffs by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) after pressure digestion. Retrieved from https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-15763-2009-foodstuffs-determination-of-trace-elements-determination-of-arsenic-cadmium-mercury-and-lead-in-foodstuffs-by-inductively-coupled-plasma-mass-spectrometry-icpms-after-pressure-digestion/.

9. Center for Food Safety (CFS). (n.d.) Ge food & your health. Retrieved from https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/311/ge-foods/ge-food-and-your-health.

10. Customs Union Commission. (2010). “On the Application of Sanitary Measures in the Customs Union”. Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/H10T0000299.

11. Fan, Z., Mu, Yu., Li, K., & Hackett, P.B. (2022). Safety evaluation of transgenic and genome-edited food animals. Trends in Biotechnology, 40(4), 371-373. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.10.012.

12. Kopko, C., Garthoff, J.A., Zhou, K., Meunier, L., O'Sullivan, A.J., & Fattori, V. (2022). Are alternative proteins increasing food allergies? Trends, drivers and future perspectives. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 129, 126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.09.008.

13. Kosieradzka, I., Sawosz, E., Szopa, J., & Bielecki, W. (2008). Potato genetically modified by 14-3-3 protein repression in growing rat diets. Part II. Health status of experimental animals. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 58(3), 377-382.

14. Li, Y., Liang, Ch., Hu, J., Geng, X., Liu, H., Feng, Y., Zhi, Y., & Yu, Zh. (2021). Safety evaluation of BPL9K-4 rice in a subchronic rodent feeding study. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 123, article number 104943. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104943.

15. Rosola, U. (2017). Current state of the agricultural products market. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo StateUniversity. Series “Economics”, 4(2), 46-51.

16. Schulman, A.H. (2020). The impact of GM crops on agriculture. In Genetically modified and irradiated food. Controversial issues: Facts versus perceptions (pp. 195-213). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817240-7.00012-7.

17. Shen, C., Yin, X.C., Jiao, B.Y., Li, J., Jia, P., Zhang, X.-W., Cheng, X.H., Ren, J.X., Lan, H.D., Hou, W.B., Fang, M., Li, X., Fei, Y.T., Robinson, N., & Liu, J.P. (2022). Evaluation of adverse effects/events of genetically modified food consumption: A systematic review of animal and human studies. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34, article number 8. doi: 10.1186/s12302-021-00578-9.

18. Udovic, M., Drobne, D., & Lestan, D. (2013). An in vivo invertebrate bioassay of Pb, Zn and Cd stabilization in contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 92(9), 1105-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.054.

19. Vergolyas, M.R., & Goncharuk, V.V. (2016). Evaluation of water quality control by using test organisms and their cells. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 38, 62-66. doi: 10.3103/S1063455X16010112.

20. Wang, P., Huang, J., Sun, J., Liu, R., Jiang, T., & Sun, G. (2022). Evaluating the nutritional properties of food: A scoping review. Nutrients, 14(11), article number 2352. doi: 10.3390/nu14112352.

21. Wang, Y.Ch., Lin, H.Y., & Chang, P.Sh. (2023). Evaluation of probiotic potentiality of GM-Lac (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) in juvenile Asian seabass Lates calcarifer. Aquaculture Reports, 30, article number 101615. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2023.101615.

22. Zhang, Li., Shen, W., Fang, Zh., & Liu, B. (2021). Effects of genetically modified maize expressing Cry1Ab and EPSPS proteins on Japanese quail. Poultry Science, 100(2), 1068-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.014.